EMPOWERING ENGLISH DEBATING COMMUNITY IN VOCATIONAL HIGHER EDUCATION: THE BRITISH PARLIAMENTARY FORMAT
Keywords:
British parliamentary format, English debating, vocational higher education, public speakingAbstract
For students in vocational higher education, the development of critical thinking, public speaking, and argumentation abilities is crucial. Members of Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya's English Debating Society (EDS) encountered difficulties in comprehending and using the British Parliamentary (BP) debate format, which is used in national and international competitions. Through organized training and mentorship exercises, this community service program sought to improve members' debate skills. 35 EDS members participated in the program, which included workshops, debate simulations, adjudication practice, and one-on-one feedback sessions. Pre-tests, post-tests, participant surveys, and observations were used to evaluate the program. The findings showed that participants' comprehension of BP debate structure, argument creation, rebuttal strategies, and Point of Information (POI) delivery had significantly improved. Between the pre-test and the post-test, the average participant score rose from 62.4 to 84.7. During debate sessions, participants also showed improved critical thinking abilities and increased self-assurance in public speaking. The program effectively improved vocational higher education students' debating skills and offered a long-lasting paradigm for debate instruction in student organizations.
Downloads
References
Barseghyan, L. (2023). Classroom debating: Benefits and challenges for undergraduate EFL students. Foreign Languages in Higher Education, 27(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.46991/FLHE/2023.27.1.067
Daniswara, L. D., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2023). Investigation of university students’ critical thinking in debate: Justification for the AREL argumentation process. Journal of English Educators Society, 8(2), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v8i2.1766
Ferrer-Aracil, J., Giménez-Bertomeu, V. M., Aragonés-González, M., & Cortés-Florín, E. (2023). The teaching-learning of community social work: Debating as an instrument to acquire transversal competences. Education Sciences, 13(7), Article 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070689
Hadi, M. S., Izzah, L., & Maharani, A. (2021). A learning analysis of EFL students’ debate activity by using British Parliamentary for enhancing speaking ability and critical thinking. Alsuna: Journal of Arabic and English Language, 4(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.31538/alsuna.v4i1.1307
Irianti, L., Faridi, A., Pratama, H., & Suwandi, S. (2024). Flipped classroom and critical thinking on public speaking class. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2315815. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2315815
Kerruish, E. (2023). Critical thinking in higher education: Taking Stiegler’s counsel on the digital milieu. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 33(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2183983
Kleijngeld, N., Miedema, W., Meijers, F., & Admiraal, W. (2023). Learning to think critically through Socratic dialogue: Evaluating a series of lessons designed for secondary vocational education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50, Article 101422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101422
Lestari, Y. (2018). Students’ perceptions toward speaking achievement and critical thinking on the use of British Parliamentary debating system. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 1(4), 458–465. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v1i4.5187
López, F., Contreras, M., Nussbaum, M., Paredes, R., Gelerstein, D., Alvares, D., & Chiuminatto, P. (2023). Developing critical thinking in technical and vocational education and training. Education Sciences, 13(6), Article 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060590
Nizzam, M., Huda, M. M., Anggraini, D., & Kholidah, U. (2023). Debate to cultivate critical thinking and communication skill. Edutechnium Journal of Educational Technology, 1(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.71365/edujet.v1i1.5
Pambudi, H. A., & Kaliaskarova, A. (2023). The foundation of English learning to equip vocational students in higher education to face industrial era 4.0. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 29(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v29i2.66994
Sofyan, M., Finefter-Rosenbluh, I., & Barnes, M. (2025). Unpacking the ethics of care and safe learning environments in Indonesian vocational higher education settings: A contested space of power and (teaching) effectiveness. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 33(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2187437
Wahyuni, S., Qamariah, H., Gani, S. A., Yusuf, Y. Q., & Syahputra, M. (2019). British Parliamentary debate system: Students’ perspective on their learning outcome. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(8), 850–854. https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i8.1865
Waluyo, G. H., & Abrar, M. (2024). The British Parliamentary debate practices in promoting English speaking proficiency: A systematic literature review in multiple EFL cases. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 3(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v3i2.292
Winduwati, S., Christina, C., & Elvan, E. (2024). Pelatihan public speaking untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi publik siswa SMA Santo Yakobus. Jurnal Serina Abdimas, 2(3), 1801–1808. https://doi.org/10.24912/jsa.v2i3.32390
Zuurmond, A., Guérin, L., Van der Ploeg, P., & Van Riet, D. (2024). Learning to question the status quo: Critical thinking, citizenship education and Bildung in vocational education. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 76(5), 1185–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2023.2166573
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Beni Wijaya, Nate Mandigo, Zakaria Zakaria, Leni Rohliah, Fathur Rohman, Balqis Cahaya Kautsar, Aditya Setiawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
